Next: Calculations of .
Up: One-loop approximation
Previous: One-loop approximation
In the one-loop approximation expression for
has the form
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45ba2/45ba285352b7857e793ac3d68af023b7dd109481" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\Sigma({\bf k},\omega)= \Sigma_{a1}({\bf k},\omega)
+ \Sigma_{a2}({\bf k},\omega) + \Sigma_{a3}({\bf k},\omega) \,,
\end{displaymath}" |
(79) |
where
is given by (A1-A3). Our
goal here is to analyze these expressions in one-pole approximation,
by substituting in it ``one-pole''
and
from (4.11) and (4.16). In the resulting
expression one can perform the integration over
analytically.
The result is
Next we introduce
, with
given by (4.14) and consider (4.18) in the limit
of small
, which allows us to perform analytically
integrations over perpendicular components of wavevectors. The result
for the damping frequency
may be represented in the
following form (for details see Appendix B):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/203e1/203e1f7ab1fd0ace12f1aa4caf2d382fa00cbab3" alt="$\displaystyle \gamma(k)=\frac{A^2 k^2}{4 \pi c }\int_{1/L}^\infty
{n(q) q^2 d q}
\simeq
\frac{A^2 k^2 }{4\pi c } N(\Omega) \ .$" |
|
|
(81) |
We introduced here cut-off for small
at
, where
is the
size of the box. We also introduced ``the density of the number of
particles''
in the solid angle according to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d46e/3d46e45619f6731d2a405f5d60f5d85929249497" alt="\begin{displaymath}
N(\Omega)=\int k^2 n({\bf k}) d k \ ,
\end{displaymath}" |
(82) |
such that the total number of particles
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd6fe/bd6fe18225072fc40fe760d5f68777befe27cc2e" alt="\begin{displaymath}
N=\int N(\Omega)d\Omega\ .
\end{displaymath}" |
(83) |
After substituting
from (B11), one has the following
estimate for
:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67df0/67df07303d8a4b77b7e92fea5adb032fdd80a93f" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\gamma({\bf k})\simeq k^2 N(\Omega)/\rho_0\, ,
\end{displaymath}" |
(84) |
Consider now
. It follows
from (B12) that
where
is the
``triad interaction'' frequency. One may evaluate the integral with
respect to
as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8056f/8056f812a198ab1e828da819d80d4774348648b0" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\L (q)=\ln{\frac{y_{\rm max}}{\Gamma_{kkq}}}
\simeq \ln{\frac{c k^2}{q \gamma({\bf k})}}. \end{displaymath}" |
(86) |
After substituting
from (4.22), one has
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aff31/aff315ab3393eebb198f7958a4297036a4522cd1" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\L (q)\propto \ln{\rho_0\c/q N(\Omega)}
\end{displaymath}" |
(87) |
The main contribution to the integral (4.23) over
comes from
the infrared region
. It gives the estimate,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cc5c/9cc5ce544d6264296a836831a0a8480286a2ee26" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\Sigma'({\bf k}) = \frac{A^2 k}{\pi^2 c^2}\L E(\Omega)
\end{displaymath}" |
(88) |
where we have defined the density of the wave energy in solid angle as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5fb92/5fb92867bf13726a3a3afcfe77bd1f3642f7a5a2" alt="\begin{displaymath}
E(\Omega)= \int \omega_0(k)n(k) k^2 d k\ .
\end{displaymath}" |
(89) |
This value relates to
as follows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3728/d3728f60808c115f0950c2a3c0db9a1acc3a48ef" alt="\begin{displaymath}
E(\Omega)\simeq \frac{ c }{L}N(\Omega) \ .
\end{displaymath}" |
(90) |
Equation (4.26) together with the expression (B11) for
may
be written as
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bdea/9bdeab53bbef0e2055d95b17f4fe5eb761cb8e15" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\Sigma'({\bf k})\simeq c k \epsilon \ln{1/\epsilon}\ ,
\end{displaymath}" |
(91) |
where
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68f7a/68f7a81096973af9d92609a82e79e3bea4438b7f" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\epsilon\simeq E(\Omega)/\rho_0 c^2 \ ,
\end{displaymath}" |
(92) |
is the dimensionless parameter of nonlinearity, the ratio of energy of
acoustic turbulence and the density of thermal energy of media
, where
is the concentration of
atoms.
Equation (4.22) for
may be written
in a similar form
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a426/4a42651e1f01c25aebae27d0ff37d7b879799742" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\gamma({\bf k})\simeq c k (k L) \epsilon\ .
\end{displaymath}" |
(93) |
One can see that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33a4c/33a4c16db6a2910d1ce274951bf5bfa017eab656" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\frac{ \gamma({\bf k})}{\Sigma'({\bf k})}\propto \frac{k L}
{\ln{1/\epsilon}}\ .
\end{displaymath}" |
(94) |
It means that for large enough inertial interval
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3bf4/a3bf4256de11461d786d6c0ca793068da728b4f3" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\gamma({\bf k}) \gg\Sigma'({\bf k})
\end{displaymath}" |
(95) |
and one may neglect the nonlinear corrections
to
the frequency with respect to the damping of the waves
. That shows that our above calculations of
is
self-consistent. Later we also will take into account only damping
in the expressions for the Green's functions taking
.
Next: Calculations of .
Up: One-loop approximation
Previous: One-loop approximation
Dr Yuri V Lvov
2007-01-17