... taken.¹

It is easily to extend the analysis to the infinite Fourier space, $k_{max} = \infty$. In this case, the full joint PDF would still have to be defined as a $N \to \infty$ limit of an $N$-mode PDF, but this limit would have to be taken in such a way that both $k_{max}$ and the density of the Fourier modes tend to infinity simultaneously.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... field.²

We keep the same acronym as in related ``Random Phase Approximation'' but now interpret it differently because (i) we emphasise the amplitude randomness and (ii) now RPA is a defined property of the field to be examined and not an approximation.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... scales.³

Hereafter we omit superscript ${(N)}$ in the $N$-mode objects if it does not lead to a confusion.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... respectively. ⁴

This technique provides a useful classification method but not a complete mathematical description of the terms involved.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... means⁵

In the present paper we consider only spatially homogeneous wave turbulence fields. In spatially homogeneous fields, due to momentum conservation, there is no coupling to the zero mode $k=0$ because such coupling would violate momentum conservation. Therefore if one of the arguments of the interaction matrix element $V$ is equal to zero, the matrix element is identically zero. That is to say that for any spatially homogeneous wave turbulence system $V^{k=0}_{k_1 k_2} = V^{k}_{k_1=0 k_2} = V^{k}_{k_1 k_2=0} =0.$

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.