Next: Bibliography
Up: Interactions of renormalized waves
Previous: Conclusions
Limiting behaviors of
for the thermalized
-FPU chain
We change variables
in the
Hamiltonian (29) for
-FPU to obtain
![$\displaystyle H(p,y)=\sum_{j=1}^N\left[\frac{1}{2}p_j^2+\frac{1}{2}y_j^2+\frac{\beta}{4}y_j^4\right].$](img365.png) |
|
|
(74) |
Next, we compute the pdf's for the momentum and displacement.
Any
is distributed with the Gaussian pdf
and any
is distributed with the
pdf
, where
and
are the normalizing constants. As we have discussed, the
renormalization factor
of the
-FPU system in thermal
equilibrium is given by Eq. (25), and its approximation via
the self-consistency argument
is given by
Eq. (52). Here, we compare the behavior of both formulas
in two limiting cases, i.e., the case of small nonlinearity
and the case of strong nonlinearity
. We will use the following expressions for
the average density of kinetic, quadratic potential and quartic
potential parts of the total energy of the system
In a
canonical ensemble, the temperature of a system is given by the
temperature of the heat bath. By identifying the average energy
density of the system with
in our simulation (a
microcanonical ensemble), we can determine
as a function of
and
by the following equation
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b91cd/b91cd7d9ea61eba7c23d014efa90b73252fd1ad8" alt="$\displaystyle \frac{1}{N}\big(\langle
K\rangle +\langle U\rangle +\langle V\rangle \big)=\bar{e}.$" |
|
|
(78) |
We start with
the case of small nonlinearity
. Suppose in the
first order of the small parameter
the temperature has the
following form
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8daac/8daacf95b477e47ebac8082e8f99d7ce257ff07b" alt="$\displaystyle \theta (\beta)=\theta _0+\beta \theta _1,$" |
|
|
(79) |
where
and
. We find the values of
and
using the constraint (A5). We use the following
expansions in the small parameter
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb356/cb35682333583fa7d87311d8792e92434cb0c7f0" alt="$\displaystyle \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{1}{2\theta (\beta)}(y^2+\beta\frac{y^4}{2})}~dy$" |
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad647/ad647ac89bb13ea76fc844a9e44be720827b4cfd" alt="$\displaystyle =\sqrt\frac{\pi}{8}\sqrt{\theta _0}\left(4+\Big(\frac{2\theta _1}{\theta _0}-3\theta _0\Big)\beta\right)+O(\beta^2),$" |
(80) |
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4834/d4834671c5a054306ca4cbeb4747dfc1f7bac41e" alt="$\displaystyle \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}y^2e^{-\frac{1}{2\theta (\beta)}(y^2+\beta\frac{y^4}{2})}~dy$" |
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/535ea/535ea7c4b6ccdbf5778ebfcc8965aead05c6cfe7" alt="$\displaystyle =\sqrt\frac{\pi}{8}\sqrt{\theta _0}\left(4\theta _0+(6\theta _1-15\theta _0^2)\beta\right)+O(\beta^2),$" |
(81) |
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/593f1/593f1f8afb5807f116bcaf8b545073866282423f" alt="$\displaystyle \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}(y^2+\frac{\beta}{2}y^4)e^{-\frac{1}{2\theta (\beta)}(y^2+\beta\frac{y^4}{2})}~dy$" |
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32f25/32f252bb5a0e9c41f4ecf261b0bd509ccdbf95fa" alt="$\displaystyle =\sqrt\frac{\pi}{8}\sqrt{\theta _0}\left(4\theta _0+(6\theta _1-9\theta _0^2)\beta\right)+O(\beta^2).$" |
(82) |
Then, in the first order in
, Eq. (A5)
becomes
and we obtain
and
. Therefore, for
the average kinetic energy density, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7824/b7824b658013051b681a281dfe3889c0f19d2771" alt="$\displaystyle \frac{\langle
K\rangle }{N}=\frac{1}{2}\bar{e}+\frac{3}{8}\bar{e}^2\beta+O(\beta^2),$" |
|
|
(83) |
and, for the average quadratic potential energy density, we
have
Finally, we obtain Eq. (53), i.e., for small
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8120/a812094045e0dbc9ac0782b6bbbf2a571835d016" alt="$\displaystyle \eta=1+\frac{3}{2}\bar{e}\beta+O(\beta^2).$" |
|
|
(85) |
Similarly, from Eq. (52), we find the small
limit
of the approximation
Now, we
consider the case of strong nonlinearity
.
From Eq. (A5), we conclude that temperature in the large
limit, which we denote as
, stays bounded, i.e.,
and, in the limit of large
, we obtain for
Eq. (A5)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edb62/edb625ae2b4fcd368bccb925c9ee681b559d9120" alt="$\displaystyle \theta_{\infty}+\frac{\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\beta}{2}y^4e^...
...dy}{\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\frac{\beta}{4\theta_{\infty}}y^4}~dy}=2\bar{e}.$" |
|
|
(86) |
After performing the integration, we obtain
and the average kinetic energy density becomes
. For the average quadratic potential energy
density, we have
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f3d2/1f3d2275a157d7d826e2301e6752f81bdbe203f3" alt="$\displaystyle \frac{\langle U\rangle }{N}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{\int_{-\infty}^{\inf...
...{3}{4})}{\Gamma(\frac{1}{4})}\left(\frac{4\bar{e}}{3\beta}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}$" |
|
|
(87) |
For the renormalization factor, we obtain the following large
scaling
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3be0/a3be09cb76c16779ff6b0aa0c8a5391b385cefaf" alt="$\displaystyle \eta=\sqrt{\frac{\Gamma(\frac{3}{4})}{\sqrt{3}\Gamma(\frac{1}{4})}}\bar{e}^\frac{1}{4}\beta^\frac{1}{4}.$" |
|
|
(88) |
Similarly, for the approximation of
, we obtain
,
, and
. Therefore, the large
scaling of
becomes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/819f6/819f6d4f74dc6f7af1556d27ad8167a9f5230902" alt="$\displaystyle \eta_{sc}=\sqrt{\frac{C+\sqrt{C^2+16}}{2}}\bar{e}^\frac{1}{4}\beta^\frac{1}{4},$" |
|
|
(89) |
which yields Eq. (54).
Next: Bibliography
Up: Interactions of renormalized waves
Previous: Conclusions
Dr Yuri V Lvov
2007-04-11